Sales Engineering 2025 Survey Results

Sales Engineering 2025 Survey Results

A practitioner-led report pairing a community survey with expert commentary from NAASE board members

Survey
February 17, 2026
Expert Interviews Presales Leadership Sales AI Tech Trends
Sales Engineering 2025 Survey Results

Sales Engineering Signals 2025 is NAASE’s practitioner-led mini report on how Sales Engineering teams are staffed, measured, and evolving. It pairs a short community mini-survey with expert commentary to translate the charts into practical implications and operating-model decisions.

Download the full report to see the complete findings and takeaways.

What stood out

A few directional signals surfaced clearly in this edition:

  • Most teams avoid a single KPI for evaluating SEs. Performance reviews and compensation most often reflect a blend of signals rather than a single number.
  • There is no universal “right” AE-to-SE ratio. Coverage models vary widely, suggesting teams are designing for deal complexity and motion rather than a fixed benchmark.
  • The SE role is broader than presales in many organizations. Respondents report involvement across renewals or expansion, enablement, and product feedback, creating value but also role-boundary pressure.
  • Win rate is the most commonly cited measurable value, but not the only one. Strategic account influence and de-risking work also appear frequently, with experience shaping how SEs describe their impact.
  • The most common frictions are operational, not technical. Workload and time pressure, plus insufficient discovery or qualification from AEs, show up as major drivers of reactive work.
  • AI use is already common, while guidance is uneven. Individual adoption is ahead of policy maturity at many companies, creating a practical gray zone that leaders need to address with guardrails and approved workflows.

Why this report is different

Most charts include an expert lens from NAASE board members and practitioners. The goal is not to over-generalize from a small sample, but to combine community signals with experienced interpretation that leaders can use to pressure-test their operating model, metrics, and role design.

Method note

Responses were collected December 16, 2025 to January 5, 2026 (N = 42). The survey was voluntary and self-selected, so results are directional. Treat them as signals for comparison and conversation, not as industry-wide benchmarks.

Get involved

If you want to contribute to future editions or share feedback, register in the NAASE member portal and join the community shaping the next set of Signals.

Contributors

The following NAASE members contributed to this perspective. Inclusion here acknowledges participation in the discussion and review process and should not be read as a full endorsement of every number or statement.
Diana Diaco Cervantes
NAASE President
Regional Sales Director, Victus Defense
Sachin Wadhawan
NAASE Advisory Board Member and Registered Coach
Global Solutions Leader, ShipBob
Mary Carter
NAASE Advisory Board Member
Solutions Engineer, zerohash
Ken Lambert
NAASE Vice President and Founder
Director of Structures & Corrosion-Free Environments, Cocoon
Ryan Bivinetto
NAASE Advisory Board Member, SE of the Year 2025
Sales Engineering Manager (Global), BlackBerry Radar
Luis Armando Vasquez Ruiz
NAASE Advisory Board Member
Mentoring, Training and Consulting, Tribu Ventas
Sandra Rogoza
NAASE Advisory Board Member
Vice President of Revenue Operations, LootzySoft